Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Ga. App. 67

Dillard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1920

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1920-12-16

<p>Indictment for burglary; from Rockdale superior court — Judge Hutcheson. June 25, 1920.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1998

2 state decisions

Relies on Jones v. State · Evans v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1920-12-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Luke, J.

¶11. “ It must affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions or the entries thereon, or the record, that the bill of exceptions was presented within the time prescribed by law.” Evans v. State, 112 Ga. 763 (38 S. E. 78); Jones v. State, 146 Ga. 8(1) (90 S. E. 280).

¶22. “ Where it does not affirmatively appear from the record that the bill of exceptions was tendered upon a date prior to the date of the judge’s certificate, it will be presumed that the certificate bears the date upon which the bill of exceptions was tendered, and the writ of error will be dismissed if a tender on that date was not within the time required by law.” Jones v. State, supra.

¶33. In this case it does not affirmatively appear from the bill of exceptions or the entries thereon, or the record, that the bill of exceptions was tendered to the trial judge within the time prescribed by law, to wit, 20 days from the date of the overruling of the motion for a new trial, the judgment complained of. The bill of exceptions must therefore be

¶4Dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., coneur.
/26/gaapp/67 · .json · Public domain