Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Ill. 369

Wheeler v. Brown

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1861

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1861-04-15

A note had been given to Charles E. Howe as trustee of Sarah H. Brown, who was a married woman, in consideration of the conveyance by her of certain real estate held in her own right, which note was secured by a deed of trust on the estate conveyed. The bill is brought for the sole use and benefit of Sarah H. Brown.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1908

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1861-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Caton, C. J.

¶1All there is of this case depends upon a simplequestioir of fact. Was it agreed by Wheeler at the time the contract of the settlement between Wheeler and the Howes was made, that Wheeler should give up the note in controversy to the complainant, Mrs. Brown ? If so, then that contract of settlement was a sufficient consideration for the agreement, and a court of equity ought to enforce it for her benefit. The proof is such as not only authorized, but, as we think, required the court so to find. Both the Howes so testify, and there is really no proof to the contrary. There are circumstances which, no doubt, tend to impair the strength of their testimony, but by nb means sufficient to overcome it.

¶2The decree must be affirmed. Decree affirmed.

/26/ill/369 · .json · Public domain