White v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. City of Chicago · Goodman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. · 94 Ill. App. 2d 215 - Sims v. Block · 3 Ill. App. 2d 481 - Durkin v. Lewitz · 348 Ill. App. 448 - Cronin v. Brownlie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ooo Respondent submitted that it had no time to do this (remove the snow). However, the weather reports showed that six days had passed since the precipitation had fallen. It is not reasonable for the State of Illinois to invite visitors, and provide as the only access route a long sidewalk covered with ice and snow. The risk of injury was clearly foreseeable. It would appear that six days was enough time, to clear the walk, since other walks on the premises were in fact cleared. Respondent was negligent in its failure to use ordinary care towards its invitees.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.