Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Ind. 93

Malott v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1866

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1866-05-15

<p>Abstract oe Record.—A compliance with the 10th rule of the court, requiring abstracts of the record to be filed by the appellant, will be insisted on.</p>

Decided 1866-05-15

Frazer, J.

¶1This cause is attempted to ‘be submitted without any compliance whatever with the tenth rule of this court, requiring an abstract of the record. A fulfillment of the requirements of that rule is so necessary to a *94prompt and correct disposition of the business of this court, and is so well commended by our experience under it, as well as by its existence and enforcement in other appellate courts, that we must insist upon its observance; especially where, as in this case, no important question is involved, and the case would, at any rate, probably be affirmed.

II. Eeffren, for appellant,D. JE. Williamson, Attorney General, for the State.

¶2The judgment is affirmed with costs.

/26/ind/93 · .json · Public domain