DOMINGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Shepard v. United States · Nijhawan v. Holder · Moncrieffe v. Holder · Rojas v. Attorney General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Immigration Judges are often called upon to examine the facts underlying a conviction to determine whether the alien is ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal as one convicted of a `particularly serious crime.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when deciding whether an alien's conduct gives the Attorney General `reason to believe' that the alien has been an illicit trafficker in a controlled substance, a human trafficker, or a money launderer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the fact of conviction is sufficient by itself to conclusively establish all facts relevant to prove the applicability of the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.