26 I. & N. Dec. 46 - M-H’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Chukwu v. Attorney General of the United States · Alaka v. Attorney General of the United States · Delgado v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“having been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime, constitutes a danger to the community of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“provide consistency in the treatment of the particularly serious crime bars for [both] asylum and withholding of removal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“promote national uniformity in the application of the particularly serious crime bar for withholding of removal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.