M-H-Z’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Russello v. United States · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart · Negusie v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that, but for the material support bar, [Hernandez] would be eligible for asylum based on her past persecution by the FARC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Congress demonstrated its ability to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.