26 I. & N. Dec. 809 - IBARRA’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez · Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc. · United States v. Corona-Sanchez · United States v. Becerril-Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no meaningful difference between a taking of property accomplished against the victim's will and one where his 'consent' to parting with his property is coerced through force, fear, or threats.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another ... against his will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.