Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 KAN 650 - Chapsky v. Wood

Chapsky v. Wood’s Empirical Analysis

1881

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
23
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably 249 Pa. Super. 274 - In Re Custody of Hernandez (1977), Ross v. Hoffman (1977)

81 state decisions — followed in 23 states

130188118901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A child is not in any sense, like a horse or any other chattel, subject-matter for absolute and irrevocable gift or contract. The father cannot, by merely giving away his child, release himself from the obligation to support it, nor be deprived of the right to its custody. In this it differs from the gift of any article which is only property.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Above all things, the paramount consideration is, what will promote the welfare of the child?””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““A parent’s right to the custody of a child is not like the right of property, an absolute and uncontrollable right. If it were, it would end this case and relieve us from all future difficulties. A mere right of property may be asserted by any man, no matter how bad, immoral, or unworthy he may be; but no case can be found in which the courts have given to the father who was a drunkard and a man of gross immoralities, the custody of a minor child, especially when that child is a girl. The fact that in such cases the courts have always refused the father the custody of his child, shows that he has not an absolute and uncontrollable right thereto.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.