26 Kan. App. 2d 275 - State v. Chappell’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2011
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · State v. Jones · State v. Chism · State v. Clemons · 4 Kan. App. 2d 130 - State v. Stoops
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the mere possibility of prejudice from a remark will not result in a reversal where an interpretation can reasonably be given to the remark that would render it unobjectionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Alidani
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.