26 Kan. App. 2d 330 - State v. Barber’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. Louisiana · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Timley · State v. Lee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial court’s failure to so instruct tire jury prevents an objective analysis as to whether the jury unanimously agreed Barber was guilty of committing a specific criminal act. And to quantify the evidence does not solve this Sixth Amendment problem — no amount of analysis would ever permit us to say the jury unanimously agreed to the underlying act supporting the conviction.” Barber, 26 Kan. App. 2d at 331 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.