Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 Kan. App. 2d 760 - Schmidt v. Shearer

26 Kan. App. 2d 760 - Schmidt v. Shearer’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. United Methodist Homes for the Aged · State v. Grissom · Smith v. Printup · In Re Cherokee County, Kansas Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds · State v. Myatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To determine which venue option applies, this court must interpret K.S.A. 60-603(3) and K.S.A. 60-604(2), which establish venue in the county where the cause of action arose.... “Arose” is defined as originating from a specified source. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 117. This language implies causation rather than the resulting injury. Focusing on causation leads to the conclusion that the proper venue for a wrongful death action is the county where the injury causing death occurred. In this case that would be Ford County. We conclude, under the facts of this ease, that either the place of the injury causing death or the place of the death are appropriate for determining venue. We conclude that the trial courts are in the best position to conclude where a suit of this nature should be tried.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.