26 Kan. App. 2d 879 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2022
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Prewett · 25 Kan. App. 2d 366 - State v. Lumley · City of Overland Park v. Fricke · 12 Kan. App. 2d 164 - State v. Frazier · In re Interest of K.J.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a statute provides for review of a magistrate judge's decision de novo by a district judge, the matter is to be tried before the district judge as if no trial had initially been had before the magistrate. This is the very definition of de novo trial, as Black's Law Dictionary attests: 'Trying a matter anew; the same as if it had not been heard before and as if no decision had been previously rendered.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“tried and determined de novo before a district judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.