¶1The case is clear in favor of the trustees. The debtor may be suffered to remain in possession of the land assigned and of things necessary for taking care of it, without any fraud. Such possession may be evidence of fraud.
¶2Trustees discharged
¶3 See Russell v. Woodward, 10 Pick. 408; Boyden v. Moore, 11 Pick. 362Hower v. Geesaman, 17 Serg. & Rawle, 251; Williams v. Lowndes, 1 Hall (N. York,) 579; 2 Kent’s Comm. (3d ed.) 534 to 536; Wheeler v. Train, 3 Pick. (2d ed.) 257, note 1.