Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 Mass. App. Ct. 595 - Commonwealth v. Kirkpatrick

26 Mass. App. Ct. 595 - Commonwealth v. Kirkpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2019

18 state decisions

701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Commonwealth v. Latimore · Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. · Tisdale v. United States · Kilcullen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he inference permitted by possession of recently stolen property can be a strong one.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “either knew or believed [the] property was stolen property at the time it came into his possession, or at any time while it was in his possession he ascertained that it was stolen property and he undertook to deprive the owner of his rightful use of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.