26 Md. App. 222 - Queen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1996
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on B. F. Saul Co. v. West End Park North, Inc. · 3 Md. App. 270 - Fabian v. State · Morrow v. State · Lauder v. State · Kaylor v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ts]ummaries or compilations made from such records may be admissible, when a proper foundation has been laid by a qualified witness on the stand.” In O’Donnell v. State, 188 Md. 693, 697 , 53 A.2d 688 (1947), the Court said:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.