Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Mo. 121

Glasby v. Prewitt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1857

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1857-10-15

<p>1. The practice act of 1849, except the 25th article, did not apply to proceedings before justices of the peace.</p> <p>2. Justices of the peace have jurisdiction in actions of trover only in cases where the damages claimed do not exceed fifty dollars.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1883

1 state decisions

Relies on Soutier v. Kellerman · Clemens v. Broomfield · Reeds v. Morton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1857-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Richardson, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This case was commenced before a justice of the peace in 1854. The plaintiff filed a written statement of his cause of *122action, complaining that the defendant had in his possession six hundred bushels of charcoal, the property of the plaintiff, which he unlawfully refused to give up ; that the charcoal was of the value of forty-two dollars ; that the plaintiff had been damaged by the detention thereof forty dollars, and asked judgment for eighty-two dollars. On the trial before the justice the plaintiff recovered a judgment, from which the defendant appealed to the circuit court. On the trial in the circuit court the case was submitted to the court without a jury. No exceptions were taken during the progress of the trial to any decision of the court, and though the record states that the court considered the plaintiff had not proved a demand, this opinion was not announced in an instruction or in any other shape so that it can be reviewed in this court. The evidence was amply sufficient to establish a conversion, and no actual demand was necessary to entitle the plaintiff to recover; birt the court did not find the facts, and no instructions were asked or given, and the case is not properly saved for an appeal or writ of error.

¶3The practice act of 1849, except the 25th article, did not apply to proceedings or actions commenced before justices of the peace, and the court therefore was not required to find the facts on which the judgment was predicated. (Code of 1849, art. 30, sec. 6; 21 Mo. 436; 19 Mo. 82; 20 Mo. 453.) The plaintiff ought, as under the old system of practice, to have asked the court to declare the propositions of law affecting his case, presented in the form of instructions, (9 Mo. 875,) and where the cause is tried by the court sitting as a jury, and no exceptions are taken until after the verdict, the judgment will not be reversed in this court. (9 Mo. 351; 21 Mo. 443; 18 Mo. 509; 19 Mo. 642; 19 Mo. 121; 24 Mo. 524.)

¶4Justices of the peace have jurisdiction in actions of trover, (12 Mo. 51,) but only in cases where the damages claimed do not exceed fifty dollars; and for the reason that the justice had no jurisdiction in this case, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff.

The other judges concur.
/26/mo/121 · .json · Public domain