Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Mont. 92

Beer v. Lieneman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1901

Montana Supreme Court · decided 1901-11-18

Action by Samson Beer against Lonis Lieneman and Charles Scbmidt. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and an order denying a new trial, the defendants appeal.

Affirmed · Decided 1901-11-18

MR. JUSTICE PIGOTT

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2These are appeals from a final judgment and ani order denying a new trial entered in the district court of Silver Bow ■county. The cause was submitted by the appellants on brief, examination of which discloses that it fails to comply with Subdivision 3 of Rule X of this court (22 Mont, xxxiv, 57 Pac. vii). It does not refer to the page numbers in the transcript; it does not contain any specification of error; nor does it even attempt to state from what either appeal was taken. Such being the condition of the brief, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed upon the authority of Harrington v. Smith, 25 Montana, 111, 63 Pacific Reporter, 1036.

¶3The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/26/mont/92 · .json · Public domain