¶1The act of July 6th, 1849, (ch. 846,) provides that “ the selectmen of the respective towns shall license one or more suitable persons to sell wine and spirituous liquors for medicinal, mechanical, and chemical purposes, and for no other use or purpose.”
¶2The 2d section enacts that if any person, not licensed as aforesaid, shall sell any wine or spirituous liquors, he shall .be subject to all the penalties provided in the existing laws.
¶3It is very evident, therefore, that the selectmen can grant no license, except for the purposes specified in the act, and that any person who sells wine or spirituous liquors .without such a license, is punishable.
¶4|4 The 5th section of the act repeals such parts of the 6th section of ch. 117 of the Revised Statutes as are inconsistent with the provisions of the act in question, and it also repeals entirely the 5th section of that chapter. The 5th section authorizes the selectmen to license any retailer to sell wine and spirituous liquors in any quantity, not less than one pint, without any specification of the purpose for which they are sold.
¶5*11The '6th section enacts that if any person, not being a licensed taverner or retailer, shall sell any spirituous liquor or wine, mixed or otherwise, he shall be punished, &c.
¶6The substantial difference between the two acts is, that by the act of 1849 spirituous liquors can be sold only for certain specified purposes, whereas by ch. 117 of the Revised Statutes, they can be sold without any limitation as to the purpose. The 5th section of this chapter is repealed in terms, and the 6th section, standing alone, is an entire prohibition of the sale of wine or spirituous liquors for any purpose whatever, for the section authorizing licenses to be granted is repealed, and it is clearly inconsistent with the provisions of the act of 1849, which admits of the sale for certain purposes. These two sections, then, being repealed, may be laid out of the case, and the question before us must be determined by the construction of the act of 1849 alone.
¶7In relation to this point, we entertain no doubt. The first section prohibits the issue of a license for any other purpose than those specified. The 2d section punishes any person, “ not licensed as aforesaid,” who shall sell wine or spirituous liquors. Thus all licenses and sales, except for medicinal, mechanical and chemical purposes, are forbidden, the words of exclusion, “ and for no other use or purpose,” admitting of but one construction. Consequently, the respondent, having sold spirituous liquor for some other purpose than those specified, has violated the statute, and is liable to a penalty.
¶8Judgment for the State»