Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 NM 231 - Jamison v. McMillen

Jamison v. McMillen’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 1980
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1980

5 state decisions

301920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Canavan v. Canavan · State Bank of Commerce v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the defendant fails to object to the complaint and litigates the material fact or facts omitted therefrom, he cannot after judgment raise the question as to the insufficiency .of the complaint, and on appeal the complaint would be amended to conform to the facts proven on the trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.