Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 NM 343 - Mazon Estate, Inc. v. Carr

Mazon Estate, Inc. v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1926
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Webb v. Beal · Wittich v. O'Neal · Markle v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The true test with regard to the allowance of1 counsel fees as damages would seem to be that, -if they -are necessarily incurred in procuring the dissolution of the injunction, when that is the sole relief sought by the action, they may be recovered; but, if the injunction is only ancillary to the principal object of the action, and the liability for counsel fees is incurred in defending the action generally, the dissolution of the injunction being only incidental to that result, then such fees cannot be recovered.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.