Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 NY2D 521 - Agesen v. Catherwood

Agesen v. Catherwood’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of Camden (1988), Steven Dezaio v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (2000)

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

13019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The distinction between the internal operations and conduct affecting external relations of the Authority is crucial in charting the areas permitting unilateral and requiring bilateral State action. New York and New Jersey have each undoubted power to regulate the external conduct of the Authority, and it may hardly be gainsaid that the Authority, albeit bistate is subject to New York’s laws involving health and safety, insofar as its activities may externally affect the public use ... Indeed, given sufficient social or economic justification, the lines of external and internal operation may shift, justifying increased regulation as the impact outside the Authority becomes more pronounced. Finally, even as to internal matters, the two States, by bilateral action, may always regulate Authority action, when unilateral action is ineffective or impractical.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.