Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 NY2D 558 - People v. Floyd

People v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2004 · most notably Payton v. New York (1980), State v. Cherry (1979)

16 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

1901970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Ker v. State of California · McDonald v. United States · Miller v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Case law has made exceptions from the statute or common-law rules for exigent circumstances which may allow dispensation with the notice . . . It has also been held or suggested that notice is not required if there is reason to believe that it will allow an escape or increase unreasonably the physical risk to the police or to innocent persons.' ( People v. Floyd , 26 N.Y.2d 558, 562, 312 N.Y.S.2d 193, 260 N.E.2d 815.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““Because the police, otherwise authorized to make a lawful arrest, effected the arrest by unlawful means, the evidence obtained as a result of the arrest may not be used and defendant’s conviction must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.