26 Ohio App. 2d 13 - State v. Mullins’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Clark v. United States · Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. United States · International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Anderson · Laskey Bros. of West Virginia, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'A privileged communication may be a shield of defense as to crimes already committed, but it cannot be used as a sword or weapon of offense to enable persons to carry out contemplated crimes against society.’ ”). 5 . State of Minnesota, et al. v. Philip Morris, Inc., et al., No. C1-94-8565 (Minn.Dist.Ct. Mar.7, 1997) (Fitzpatrick, J.). 6 . The nearly 40,000 documents consist of an initial production of 864”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.