26 Ohio App. 3d 164 - Andrulis v. Andrulis’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(A) In all contempt proceedings, the court shall conduct a hearing. At the hearing, the court shall investigate the charge and hear any answer or testimony that the accused makes or offers and shall determine whether the accused is guilty of the contempt charge. If the accused is found guilty, the court may impose any of the following penalties: {¶ 24} "(1) For a first offense, a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars, a definite term of imprisonment of not more than thirty days in jail, or both; {¶ 25} "(2) For a second offense, a fine of not more than five hundred dollars, a definite term of imprisonment of not more than sixty days in jail, or both; {¶ 26} "(3) For a third or subsequent offense, a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, a definite term of imprisonment of not more than ninety days in jail, or both.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Scassa v. Scassa, Unpublished Decision (3-26-2004)

2. “absent a motion for modification of support, and modification, termination or restriction of visitation rights, the trial court's continuing jurisdiction over visitation and support [is] not invoked.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Scassa v. Scassa, Unpublished Decision (3-26-2004)