Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 Ohio App. 3d 24 - State v. Orr

26 Ohio App. 3d 24 - State v. Orr’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably State v. Davis (1991), 46 Ohio App. 3d 152 - State v. Theuring (1988)

36 state decisions

21019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court may require a person who is convicted of or pleads guilty to a misdemeanor to make restitution for all or part of the property damage that is caused by his offense. * * *””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(C) Explanation of rights. When a defendant not represented by counsel is brought before a court and called upon to plead, the judge or magistrate shall cause him to be informed and shall determine that he understands all of the following: {¶ 21} "(1) He has a right to retain counsel even if he intends to plead guilty, and has a right to reasonable continuance in the proceedings to secure counsel. {¶ 22} "(2) He has a right to counsel, and the right to a reasonable continuance in the proceeding to secure counsel, and pursuant to Crim.R. 44, the right to have counsel assigned without cost to himself if he is unable to employ counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(2) He has a right to counsel, and the right to a reasonable continuance in the proceeding to secure counsel, and pursuant to Crim.R. 44, the right to have counsel assigned without cost to himself if he is unable to employ counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.