26 Ohio App. 3d 95 - State v. Van Dyne’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2014
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Grace · New York State Liquor Authority v. Bellanca · City of Cincinnati v. Hoffman · 140 Ohio St. 210 - State v. Chester
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The interest of the state in controlling the possession and consumption of alcohol is well-established. The state’s interest in regulating possession of opened containers of alcohol in public places, while perhaps not as compelling, is similar to the state’s interest in regulating the possession of thievery tools, concealed weapons, and scheduled substances. While the possession of an opened can of beer by defendant in this case perhaps posed no threat to public health or safety, it is the possibility of abuse of the substance in his opened container by others, and his potential abuse of the substance, that gives the state its right to regulate his conduct in a public place. This is the price which he pays for living in a society in which the misconduct of some affects the freedom of us all. The state has a legitimate interest in controlling the places in which people may possess opened containers of liquor or beer. * * * ” Van Dyne, supra, at 96-97 , 26 OBR at 271, 498 N.E.2d at 223 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““No person shall have in his possession an opened container of beer or intoxicating liquor in a state liquor store, or on the premises of the holder of any permit issued by the department of liquor, or any other public place. * * * f)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“By most people, a sidewalk, which is the means by which pedestrians walk across private property, is considered to be a public place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.