Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 OHIOST2D 178 - State v. Breedlove

State v. Breedlove’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably State v. Zuern (1987), 120 Ohio App. 3d 320 - State v. Wills (1997)

34 state decisions

110197119801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · United States v. Wade · State v. Hector · Barnes v. United States · State v. Lancaster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the use of the mug shot in Lancaster could not give rise to suspicion in the minds of the jurors that the accused had prior criminal involvement, since it was there specified that the photograph was taken after the arrest for the crime for which he was being tried.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When identification of the defendant is an issue, a witness who has on previous occasion identified such person may testify to such previous identification. Such identification may be proved by other witnesses .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “where the prior offense, if shown to be part of a common plan or scheme and evidence thereof, is admitted to prove the elements of intent, motive, knowledge or identity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.