Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 OR 502 - State ex rel. Booth v. Bryan

State ex rel. Booth v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1920
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Houston Tap & Brazoria Railway Co. v. Randolph · Martin v. Ingham · People ex rel. Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. Glann · Board of Trustees of the Illinois & Michigan Canal v. People ex rel. Hoes · Redding v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a just presumption that all public officers will faithfully discharge the functions of their respective offices, and observe all the duties enjoined upon them by law, and it would be a work of supererogation for the courts by mandamus or other process to command them to perform their duties in futuro as they are by law directed. Courts will not assume or exercise supervisory control over public officers and functionaries, whether state, county, or municipal, nor will they attempt to control their acts, or command them to act, except in cases where there has been a plain violation of official and public duty which the law specially enjoins upon them, and it is made to appear that some private individual or the public has a legal right or title to the due performance of such duty, and that there exists no other plain, speedy, or adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.