Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

26 Or. App. 359

State v. David

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 1976

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1976-08-02

Decided 1976-08-02

PER CURIAM.

¶1Counsel have stipulated:

"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/26/orapp/359 · .json · Public domain