Nunley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
January 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cooksey v. State · Patterson v. State · 20 Va. App. 510 - Cook v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the language of former AS 12.63.010(a) maldle it clear that '[all]l sex offender{s] who [are] physically present in the state shall register.... 11 From this, we concluded that "sex offenders physically present in Alaska who had been released from probation before the effective date of ASORA still were required to comply with the general duty to register - set forth in former AS 12.63.010(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hawkins“that the legislature intended to subject convicted sex offenders such as the appellants to criminal penalties under former AS 11.56.840 for failing to comply with ASORA's general duty to register.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hawkins“[the language of former AS 12.63.010(a) maldle it clear that '[all]l sex offender{s] who [are] physically present in the state shall register.... 11 From this, we concluded that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hawkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.