Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 So. 3d 176 - State v. Wallace

26 So. 3d 176 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Refre v. United States · Erickson v. Illinois · 621 So. 2d 769 - State v. Shelton · 514 So. 2d 99 - State v. Brown · 349 So. 2d 311 - State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the state has the burden of proving that the 10-year period has not expired, the state need not prove the discharge date when less than 10 years have elapsed between the last conviction and the subsequent conviction. State v. Smith, (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/20/05), 913 So.2d 836 ; State v. Collins, 2001-1459 (La.App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02) , 826 So.2d 598 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.