26 So. 3d 383 - Conner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State · 413 So. 2d 1372 - York v. State · 835 So. 2d 14 - Hawthorne v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court will reverse and render only if the facts and inferences point in favor of the defendant on any element of the offense with sufficient force that reasonable men could not have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty. The evidence will be deemed sufficient if having in mind the beyond a reasonable doubt burden of proof standard, reasonable fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions on every element of the offense. Thus, the relevant question is whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. This Court considers the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. The State also receives the benefit of all favorable inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.