Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 SO3D 616 - Teague v. State

Teague v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 630 So. 2d 521 - Hale v. State · State v. Callaway · Williamson v. Williamson · 546 So. 2d 1051 - Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co. · In Re Estate of Yohn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to allege a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion, the appellant must allege: (1) he is serving an illegal sentence; (2) the error appears on the face of the record; and (3) how and where the record demonstrates an entitlement to relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.