Root & Fehl v. Murray Tool Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 1974 · most notably Knutson v. Ripson (1962), Industrial Life Insurance Company v. Finley (1964)
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on First National Bank of Amarillo v. Rush · 58 Tex. Civ. App. 443 - Hunt v. Ogden · 27 Tex. Civ. App. 175 - Daugherty v. Herndon · Simms Oil Co. v. American Refining Co. · Buford v. Inge Const. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the settled law of this state that, when an account is made the subject of a bona fide dispute between the parties as to its correctness, and the debtor tenders his check to the creditor upon condition that it be accepted in full payment, the creditor must either refuse to receive the check or accept the same burdened by its attached condition. If he accepts the check and cashes the same, he impliedly agrees to the condition, although he may expressly notify the debtor that he is not accepting the same with the condition, but is only applying the same as a partial payment on the account.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““We think, in view of the fact that there was no evidence in the record of any express agreement between the parties that the check was to be accepted only as partial payment, the legal effect of the acceptance with the knowledge of the recital on the check that it was tendered in full payment, as a matter of law, operated to sustain plaintiff in error’s plea of accord and satisfaction, entitling it to the judgment rendered by the trial court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““On October 14, 1926, when the defendants delivered a check of $254.71, was it agreed between the parties that this would be in full satisfaction of all claims and controversies, if any, theretofore existing between the parties?””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knutson v. Ripson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.