Satterwhite v. Jacobs

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 2000

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 2000-05-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2001

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-05-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellee, George O’Neal Jacobs a/k/a George Jacobs and Associates, has filed motions for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration. The panel overrules his motion for rehearing and the en banc Court denies his motion for en banc reconsideration.

¶3It is so ordered.

En banc Court consists of Chief Justice SCHNEIDER and Justices COHEN, MIRABAL, O’CONNOR, WILSON, HEDGES, ANDELL, TAFT, NUCHIA, and EVANS.

¶4Justice O’CONNOR dissents from the denial of en banc reconsideration.