Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 TC 474 - Wilson v. Commissioner

Wilson v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
March 1982
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1982

4 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1101956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sra v. State of Minnesota · City of New Brunswick v. United States · Rayburn Et Ux. v. Crawford Et Ux. · Reid v. Kier · Harder Et Ux. v. City of Springfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * (k) Gain or loss in the case of timber or coal. — 17 "(1) If the taxpayer so elects * * * the cutting of timber (for sale or for use in the taxpayer's trade or business) * * * by the taxpayer who owns, or has a contract right to cut, such timber (providing he has owned such timber or has held such contract right for a period of more than six months * * *) shall be considered a sale or exchange of such timber cut * *. 18 "(2) In the case of the disposal of timber * * * held for more than 6 months prior to such disposal, by the owner thereof under any form or type of contract by virtue of which the owner retains an economic interest in such timber * * * the adjusted depletion basis thereof shall be considered as though it were a gain or loss, as the case may be, upon the sale of such timber * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.