Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 TEX 445 - Bohanan v. Hans

Bohanan v. Hans’s Empirical Analysis

1863

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2004

18 state decisions

50186318701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is said that no predicate was laid for the admission of the ‘said transcript’; but what was meant hy this objection, does not appear. A party objecting to evidence ought to state his objection clearly and specifically, so that it may be understood by the court, and met and obviated by the opposing party, if it be capable of being removed by the production of other evidence. The objection is too indefinite.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.