¶1Appeal from a refusal to grant a petition for habeas corpus in a robbery case, for the purported reasons 1) that defendant was coerced into pleading guilty and 2)■ that the so-called standards of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1968), were fractured. We-believe and hold that neither contention has merit under the record here and consequently affirm the trial court.
26 Utah 2d 124
Hall v. Turner
Decided June 22, 1971
Utah Supreme Court · decided 1971-06-22
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1987
10 state decisions
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1971-06-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →