Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 Va. App. 627 - Marshall v. Commonwealth

26 Va. App. 627 - Marshall v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2012

20 state decisions

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 4 Va. App. 438 - Martin v. Commonwealth · Coleman v. Commonwealth · 8 Va. App. 194 - Long v. Commonwealth · 25 Va. App. 215 - Redman v. Commonwealth · 4 Va. App. 433 - Mounce v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “affirmatively show[ ] that a miscarriage of justice has occurred, not . . . merely . . . that a miscarriage might have occurred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Pursuant to Rule 5A:18, this Court will not consider trial court error as a basis for reversal where no timely objection was made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]n regard[ ] to credit card theft. Even at this juncture when the Court’s heard from the victim and [heard] the statement made by the defendant, even taking it in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the defendant’s charged with credit card theft, and the evidence at this point has been that the defendant had permission on at least two occasions to have possession of the credit card, to use the credit card[,] and to make purchases through the use and the signing of his name on behalf of Mr. Sullivan. So Judge, I don’t know if the Commonwealth’s met the burden for the credit card theft to show that he took the card without permission, or that they have shown that the defendant committed credit card fraud.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.