26 Wash. App. 1 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 101 Wash. 2d 745 - State v. Laureano (1984), 33 Wash. App. 428 - State v. Gosser (1982)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Josef Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“`It would be a curious rule of evidence which allowed one party to bring up a subject, drop it at a point where it might appear advantageous to him, and then bar the other party from all further inquiries about it.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'An amendment to an information at trial may prejudice a defendant by leaving him without adequate time to prepare a defense to a new charge.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.