26 Wash. App. 382 - State v. Tuttle’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1986
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Beasley v. United States · Cooper v. Fitzharris · 81 Wash. 2d 628 - State v. Frazier · 91 Wash. 2d 86 - State v. Adams · 85 Wash. 2d 45 - State v. Cosner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After considering the entire record, can it be said that the accused was afforded an effective representation and a fair and impartial trial? . . . This test places a weighty burden on the defendant to prove two things: first, considering the entire record, that he was denied effective representation; and second, that he was prejudiced thereby.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.