Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 26 WIS2D 451 - State v. Stevens

State v. Stevens’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

110
cited by 110 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 110 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably Deck v. Missouri (2005), 60 Wis. 2d 683 - State v. Cydzik (1973)

1 federal appellate · 99 state decisions

530196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Rabinowitz · Preston v. United States · Agnello v. United States · Harris v. United States · Abel v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On an appeal in a criminal case the test of the sufficiency of the evidence for a conviction is ‘whether the evidence adduced, believed and rationally considered by the jury, was sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’ State v. Johnson (1960), 11 Wis. (2d) 130, 137, 104 N. W. (2d) 379 ; State v. John (1960), 11 Wis. (2d) 1, 103 N. W. (2d) 304 ; Parke v. State (1931), 204 Wis. 443 , 235 N. W. 775 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Within such scope of the search, instruments, evidence, and fruits of the crime for which the defendant was arrested may be searched for and seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “for the limited purpose of identifying the defendant by means of the method of operation as the person who committed the particular crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.