Schilling v. Stockel’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 63 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably 74 Wis. 2d 526 - Coffey v. City of Milwaukee (1976), 94 Wis. 2d 17 - Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc. (1980)
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 63 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. · Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc. · Klassa v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co. · Waube v. Warrington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]nce an act has been found to be negligent, we no longer look to see if there was a duty to the one who was in fact injured.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]n cases so extreme that it would shock the conscience of society to impose liability, the courts may step in and hold as a matter of law that there is no liability.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) The injury is too remote from the negligence; or (2) the injury is too wholly out of proportion to the culpability of the negligent tort-feasor; or (3) in retrospect it appears too highly extraordinary that the negligence should have brought about the harm; or (4) because allowance of recovery would place too unreasonable a burden on the negligent tort-feasor; or (5) because allowance of recovery would be too likely to open the way for fraudulent claims; or (6) allowance of recovery would enter a field that has no sensible or just stopping point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.