State v. Enoch’s Empirical Analysis
1885
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1972
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chew Heong v. United States · State v. Stoll · McConiha v. Guthrie · Forqueran v. Donnally · Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hoard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there must be such a positive repugnancy between the provisions of the new law and the old, that they can not stand together or be consistently reconciled”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.