Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 A2D 255 - D. v. D.

D. v. D.’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Callen v. Gill · Munzer v. Swedish American Line · 106 N.J. Super. 515 - Osterman v. Ehrenworth · 91 N.J. Super. 377 - Myers v. St. Francis Hospital · 107 N.J. Super. 121 - Unick v. Kessler Memorial Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there are fundamental policy considerations which dictate the need for flexibility in applying the technical rules of evidence in an effort to reach the proper result where the issue involves custody and the welfare of infant children.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “right to invoke the patient-physician privilege must yield to the paramount rights of the infant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.