Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2011
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Deslovers · Commonwealth v. Pava · State v. Thompson · State v. Lazarone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person designated and sworn by the Court as the interpreter for the trial becomes part of the Court's 'team’ momentarily and is cloaked with officialdom in the eyes of the jury.”) (emphasis added). See also 9A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2417 (3d ed.) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gomez v. State““The use and qualifications of an interpreter are matters for the consideration of the trial Judge in his discretion. The propriety of his action is to be weighed in the light of all the relevant circumstances, and will not be interfered with unless injustice to the defendant clearly appears.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gonzales v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.