Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 AD 284 - Seguin v. Berg

Seguin v. Berg’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1966
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Marshall v. . Davies · Winchell v. . Winchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Evidence which would have been proper as part of plaintiff’s affirmative case, and which he has no right to introduce as affirmative evidence after the defendants had rested, may still be offered by the plaintiff if it tends to impeach or discredit the testimony of defendants.” Seguin v. Berg, 260 App.Div. 284 , 21 N.Y.S.2d 291 at 293 (1940).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.