Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 ALA 203 - McMurphy v. Pipkin

McMurphy v. Pipkin’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 1964
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. Fonville · St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Guthrie · Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. George · Walker County v. Davis · City of Birmingham v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““4X. That the Plaintiff was guilty of negligence which contributed to her injury for in this, that at the time the plaintiff approached the door to the Sweet Shop the same was open and visible for a sufficient length of time to enable her to observe said obstruction, and the plaintiff then and there was engaged in opening or closing an umbrella and walked into said door, which by the use of due care, she would have observed and could have avoided, and thus suffered the injuries complained of.” ( 260 Ala. 204 , 69 So.2d)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.