Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 260 ALA 280 - Casey v. Krump

Casey v. Krump’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 1975
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1975

12 state decisions

60195419601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cox v. Parker · Spence v. Spence · McCarty v. Harris · Gardiner v. Willis · Stanfill v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to render a deed void because of the mental incapacity of the grantor — and the principle is the same for any other signatory — the test is ‘not merely that the grantor’s mental powers were impaired, but whether he had sufficient capacity to understand in a reasonable manner the nature and effect of the act which he was doing.’ 18 Corp.Jur. 218, § 131; White v. Farley, 81 Ala. 563 , 8 So. 215 ; Stanfill v. Johnson, 159 Ala. 546 , 49 So. 223 .”;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““That on the 5th day of January, 1949, the purported date of the execution and delivery of said document, a copy of which is attached to the original bill of complaint as Exhibit A’, the said Nic Krump was of unsound mind, and incapable of executing and delivering said document as a valid deed of conveyance of said lands, of which facts the respondent well knew.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.